Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41087934›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2025

Intraperitoneal ketamine versus bupivacaine for postoperative pain control after laparoscopic cholecystectomy - a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Shehrum Bughio, Syed Muhammad Nadeem, Arsala Rahman, Palwasha Khan Kasi, Sadam Hussain, Hanesh Tanwani

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06807554 (Intraperitoneal Ketamine Versus Bupivacaine for Postoperative Pain Control After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06807554 early_phase1completednot on this map

Intraperitoneal Ketamine Versus Bupivacaine for Postoperative Pain Control After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorLiaquat National Hospital & Medical CollegeRan2022 to 2022Enrolled92ConditionsLaparoscopic Cholecystectomy SurgeryArmsKetamine, Bupivacaine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shehrum BughioDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Management, Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College, National Stadium Road, Karachi, Pakistan. shehrumbughio@gmail.com.
Syed Muhammad NadeemDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Management, Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College, National Stadium Road, Karachi, Pakistan.
Arsala RahmanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Management, Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College, National Stadium Road, Karachi, Pakistan.
Palwasha Khan KasiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Management, Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College, National Stadium Road, Karachi, Pakistan.
Sadam HussainDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Management, Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College, National Stadium Road, Karachi, Pakistan.
Hanesh TanwaniDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Management, Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College, National Stadium Road, Karachi, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntraperitoneal instillation of local anesthetics is commonly used to manage pain associated with laparoscopic surgeries. Few studies have compared intraperitoneal instillation of ketamine with bupivacaine for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). This study aimed to compare the effects of intraperitoneal instillation of ketamine versus bupivacaine on postoperative pain control following LC.

methodsThis double-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted by the Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Management at Liaquat National Hospital. Patients were divided into Group K and Group B. Group K received ketamine at a dose of 0.25 mg/kg diluted in 40 ml of saline intraperitoneally, while Group B received 2 mg/kg bupivacaine diluted in 40 ml of saline. Pain scores were assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale at 5 min, 15 min, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h postoperatively.

resultsA total of 46 patients in each group were studied. At 5 min, the average pain score was 2.1 ± 0.5 in Group K and 2.8 ± 0.7 in Group B (p < 0.001). At 15 min (1.5 ± 0.2 versus 3.6 ± 0.4), 6 h (2.5 ± 0.5 versus 4.8 ± 0.4), 12 h (3 ± 1.1 versus 4.5 ± 0.7), and 24 h (1.8 ± 0.8 versus 4.1 ± 1.2), the mean pain score was significantly lower in Group K than in Group B. Analgesia requirement was significantly higher in the bupivacaine group, whereas the mean time to seek the first rescue analgesia was longer in the ketamine group. No adverse events other than postoperative nausea and vomiting were observed.

conclusionThe present study found that in elective LC, intraperitoneal instillation of ketamine at a dose of 0.25 mg/kg was superior to bupivacaine alone in reducing postoperative pain and analgesic demand from initial 6 to 24 h after surgery, without any safety concerns. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: This trial was retrospectively registered on January 29, 2025, in clinicaltrials.gov with trial number ‘NCT06807554’.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicKetaminePostoperative PainAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInjections, IntraperitonealMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementAnalgesicsAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineKetamineBupivacaineCholecystectomyIntraperitoneal instillationKetamineLaparoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID41087934
PMCPMC12522770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.