ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
Tube-bearing experience of patients with biliary and pancreatic diseases outside the hospital: based on qualitative study.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to understand the experience of patients with external drainage tube out of hospital with biliary and pancreatic system diseases and provide a theoretical basis and reference for formulating nursing intervention measures based on the actual experience of patients with ducts.
methodsThis is a qualitative study, semi-structured in-depth interviews were used to gather information. Purposive Sampling method was used to select patients who treated in the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and the Pipeline Nursing Outpatient Department of a triple A hospital in Yinchuan City, Ning Xia province, China, and had external drainage tubes in place outside the hospital for more than one month as research objects. Semi-structured interviews were conducted under the guidance of phenomenological research methods, and 17 participants were finally included. This study was reviewed by the Research Ethics Committee of the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University (Ethics number: KYLL-2022-1341). The study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki, all subjects voluntarily participated in this study.
resultsFour themes and ten sub-themes were extracted, including negative coping and reduced quality of life due to changes in life and work status (difficulty in role transformation: patient role intensification, negative coping with work and social life, gastrointestinal function is impaired, limited daily dietary choices, and reduced quality of life), physical and mental stress and negative experience (psychological coping burden, physical discomfort and negative experience), disease uncertainty and negative attitudes caused by lack of knowledge (lack of knowledge disease-related knowledge leads to a sense of uncertainty about recovery from the disease, negative attitude towards pipe care, lack of knowledge and skills); and seeking for medical support positively (get a suitable drainage device, perfect fixing tape and dressing, improve the status of the subsequent visit).
conclusionThe patients' experience of patients with drainage tube outside of hospital for hepatobiliary and pancreatic system diseases is primarily discomfort and negative experience. There are some discomfort experiences and a lack of relevant-disease knowledge, and patients are eager to get professional help from the medical staff.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.