Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41087906›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2025

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Arabic version of the SARC-F for evaluating sarcopenia in Saudi older adults.

Bader A Alqahtani, Aqeel M Alenazi, Mohammed M Alshehri, Ahmed S Alhowimel, Bashayer A Alharbi, Norah A Alhwoaimel

Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07435272 (Kinesiophobia in Rheumatoid Arthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07435272 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Kinesiophobia in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Associations With Functional Disability, Disease Activity, and Related Clinical Factors

TypeobservationalSponsorMinia UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled400ConditionsKinesiophobia (Fear of Movement), Rhematoid Arthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Rheumatoid
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bader A AlqahtaniDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, 11942, Saudi Arabia. dralqahtaniba@gmail.com.
Aqeel M AlenaziDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed M AlshehriDepartment of Physical Therapy, Jazan University, Jazan, 45142, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed S AlhowimelDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Bashayer A AlharbiSaudi Centre for Appointments and Medical Referrals, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Norah A AlhwoaimelDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, 11942, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University PSAU/2025/03/33826
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study is to translate and cross-culturally adapt the SARC-F to Arabic and to assess the reliability and validity of the scale for use among community-dwelling older adults in Saudi Arabia.

methodsOlder adults aged 60 years and above were included. The translation and cross-cultural adaptation process followed standardized guidelines. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were evaluated over two visits one week apart. Moreover, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the SARC-F were calculated. The validity of the Arabic version of the SARC-F was assessed against other measurements related to sarcopenia.

resultsA total of 182 community-dwelling older adults were enrolled (mean age = 65 ± 5.2 years). The internal consistency with the overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.71. For the test-retest reliability with a one-week interval, the ICC was 0.94. The Arabic SARC-F scale was significantly associated with other measurements related to sarcopenia. The sensitivity of the Arabic SARC-F ranged from 28 to 50%, and the specificity ranged from 81.4 to 82.9%.

conclusionThe SARC-F was successfully translated and adapted into the Arabic language. The Arabic SARC-F showed excellent reliability and adequate validity but revealed low sensitivity with high specificity across different sarcopenia definitions, which indicates that it can detect the absence of sarcopenia.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonSarcopeniaAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSaudi ArabiaTranslationsOlder adultsSARC-FSarcopeniaSaudi

Identifiers

PMID41087906
PMCPMC12522759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.