ArticleBMC plant biology2025
Alfalfa adapts to soil nutrient surplus and deficiency by adjusting the stoichiometric characteristics of main organs and nutrient reabsorption.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fertilization measures improve agronomic traits of alfalfa by regulating root bacterial co-occurrence networks.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate nutrient diagnosis is essential for simulating alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) yield and optimizing resource-use efficiency under diverse soil nutrient conditions. However, limited knowledge exists about how fertilization impacts soil–plant nutrient stoichiometric constraints, especially in nutrient-deficient gray desert soils. This study conducted a field experiment with four nitrogen (N) application rates: 0, 60, 120, and 180 kg N∙ha−1 and four phosphorus (P) application rates: 0, 50, 100, and 150 kg P2O5∙ha−1. We assessed changes in the nutrient limitation characteristics of alfalfa and identified its primary driving factors, focusing on soil nutrient perspectives, nutrient distribution in main organs (leaves, shoots, and roots) and nutrient resorption. The results demonstrated that fertilization increased N and P concentrations in various alfalfa organs while reducing carbon (C) content. A strong synergy was observed in nutrient concentrations across the different alfalfa organs. With increasing application of single-nutrient fertilizers, the C:N and C:P ratios in alfalfa organs decreased, while the N:P ratio stabilized under conditions of sufficient or co-limiting soil N and P. Alfalfa N:P ratios under different fertilization treatments were 4.89–5.46 in roots, 6.19–8.45 in stems, and 9.10–15.16 in leaves. The C:N and C:P ratios were significantly negatively correlated with alfalfa yield, but the relationship between the N:P ratio and yield was not statistically significant. Soil nutrient status positively influenced N and P concentrations in leaves, stems, and roots, however, their effect on stoichiometric ratios was primarily mediated through indirect effects on corresponding organ-level nutrients. Moreover, soil nutrients directly or indirectly explained 98% of the variation in nutrient resorption in leaves. In conclusion, fertilization indirectly affects the stoichiometric characteristics of alfalfa organs via soil nutrients. Adjusting fertilizer nutrient ratios can mitigate nutrient limitations in both soil and alfalfa, providing valuable insights for fertilizer formulation, timing of fertilizer application, and fertilization application strategies. Highlights 1.Fertilization alters the C-N-P stoichiometry of the soil–plant system. 2.The stoichiometric characteristics and ratios of different organs exhibit a certain degree of synergy. 3.Stoichiometric ratios can represent nutrient limitation to a certain extent. 4.Soil nutrient changes affect the stoichiometric characteristics and ratios of alfalfa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.