Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41087856›Full record

ArticleCellular & molecular biology letters2025

Inhibition of DHHC9-mediated CD36 palmitoylation lessens high-fat diet (HFD)-induced impairment of pubertal mammary gland development through the JNK-ERK pathway.

Yiming Fu, Fenglin Zhang, Limin Lang, Shuyi Liang, Junfeng Wang, Shilei Zhang, Kaixin Deng, Jinhao Liu, Lilin Cai, Yue Zhang and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular & molecular biology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Yiming Fu *Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, People's Republic of China.
Fenglin Zhang *Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, People's Republic of China.
Limin LangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, People's Republic of China.
Shuyi LiangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, People's Republic of China.
Junfeng WangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, People's Republic of China.
Shilei ZhangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, People's Republic of China.
Kaixin DengGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, People's Republic of China.
Jinhao LiuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, People's Republic of China.
Lilin CaiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, People's Republic of China.
Yue ZhangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, People's Republic of China.
Lidong YanGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, People's Republic of China.
Guo RenGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, People's Republic of China.
Haoyan KangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, People's Republic of China.
Lina WangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, People's Republic of China.
Canjun ZhuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, People's Republic of China.
Ruifan WuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, People's Republic of China.
Gang ShuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, People's Republic of China.
Qingyan JiangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, People's Republic of China.
Songbo WangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, People's Republic of China. songbowang@scau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6370-5468

Funding

Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China 31790411Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China 31972636Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China 32172682Key Technologies Research and Development Program 2022YFD1300904Key Technologies Research and Development Program 2023YFD1301303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCD36, a vital fatty acid translocase, has been reported to participate in multiple physiological functions through palmitoylation mediated by zinc finger Asp-His-His-Cys-type palmitoyltransferases (DHHCs). This study aimed to investigate the possible involvement of DHHC-mediated CD36 palmitoylation in high-fat diet (HFD)-induced impairment of pubertal mammary gland development and explore the underlying mechanisms involved.

methodsPalmitic acid (PA)-treated HC11 cells were used as the in vitro high-fat model, and the cell proliferation was examined by 5-Ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU) incorporation assay. The palmitoylation of CD36 was determined by the acyl-biotin exchange (ABE) method. The expression of CD36, proliferative genes, and signaling molecules was detected by immunoblotting. The cellular localization of CD36 was determined by immunofluorescence. The bindings of CD36 with zinc finger DHHC-type palmitoyltransferases 9 (DHHC9) or Fyn/Lyn were detected by co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP). The palmitoylation inhibitor 2-bromopalmitate (2BP), DHHC9 knockdown, and point mutation of CD36 cysteine residues were applied to construct a CD36 palmitoylation deficiency model in vitro to investigate the effects of CD36 palmitoylation on HC11 proliferation. In vivo, the pubertal mice were treated with HFD and/or 2BP. Mammary gland morphology was determined by whole mount staining, and the underlying mechanisms were verified by the methods used in the in vitro system.

resultsIn vitro, the palmitoylation inhibitor 2BP eliminated PA-inhibited HC11 proliferation and inhibited CD36 palmitoylation and localization on the plasma membrane. Meanwhile, the binding of DHHC9 and CD36 in PA-treated HC11 cells was repressed by 2BP. In addition, both knockdown of DHHC9 and point mutation of CD36 cysteine residues suppressed the membrane palmitoylation and localization of CD36 and stimulated the proliferation of PA-treated HC11 cells. Furthermore, in PA-treated HC11 cells, the inhibition of CD36 palmitoylation, the knockdown of DHHC9, and the mutation of CD36 cysteine residues resulted in decreased formation of the CD36/Fyn/Lyn complex. Correspondingly, the downstream c-jun n-terminal kinase 1 (JNK1) pathway was inhibited, and the extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) pathway was activated. Moreover, inhibition of the JNK pathway with SP600125 promoted the proliferation of PA-treated HC11 cells via activation of the ERK1/2 pathway. In vivo, the palmitoylation inhibitor 2BP ameliorated HFD-induced impairment of mammary gland development in pubertal female mice, which was associated with a decrease in DHHC9-mediated CD36 palmitoylation in the plasma membrane, a reduction in the CD36/Fyn/Lyn complex, inhibition of the JNK1 pathway, and activation of the ERK1/2 pathway.

conclusionsThis study revealed that inhibition of DHHC9-mediated CD36 palmitoylation mitigated HFD-induced impairment of pubertal mammary gland development via the JNK1-ERK1/2 pathway.

Indexed as

AcyltransferasesCD36 AntigensDiet, High-FatLipoylationMammary Glands, AnimalMAP Kinase Signaling SystemAnimalsCell LineCell ProliferationFemaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLAcyltransferasesCD36 AntigensCD36 palmitoylationCell proliferationDHHC9HFD-fed micePubertal mammary gland development

Identifiers

PMID41087856
PMCPMC12522926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.