ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
Gallstone disease: on whom we should operate and on whom we do operate-an Italian snapshot.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gallstone disease affects one-fifth of the population in Western countries, with 20% of patients experiencing biliary colic. The remaining 80% of patients are asymptomatic or report abdominal symptoms other than biliary colic (mild-symptomatic). International guidelines recommend cholecystectomy for symptomatic patients and surveillance for non-symptomatic individuals, without specific recommendations for mild-symptomatic. The laparoscopic approach has increased cholecystectomy rates, potentially extending indications to mild and asymptomatic cases. This study presents the results of a survey among physicians involved in the management of gallstone disease, focusing on the adherence of their clinical approach to 2016 EASL guidelines. The survey involved 220 physicians (surgeons, gastroenterologists, radiologists, and general practitioners). Participants completed a questionnaire addressing their professional characteristics, including the volume of gallstone patients treated yearly. Based on their knowledge and experience, physicians expressed their therapeutic approach for ten clinical scenarios, encompassing asymptomatic, mild-symptomatic and symptomatic patients. 89% of participants recommended cholecystectomy for patients suffering from biliary colic, while 48.1% recommended surgery for asymptomatic or mild-symptomatic patients. Remarkably, 20% of gastroenterologists and general practitioners suggested litholytic therapy for asymptomatic and mild-symptomatic cases. Factors favoring surgery included: patients under 40, mild symptoms and less than 10 years of clinical experience for surgeons. Disparities persist in the clinical management of gallstone disease patients, deviating from guidelines. Despite inconclusive evidence supporting the benefit of cholecystectomy for mild and asymptomatic cases, our study shows that a significant proportion of physicians indicate cholecystectomy as the preferred treatment, indicating a significant gap between practice and guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41087823What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.