Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41087813›Full record

ReviewAdvances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology2026

Edible Scaffolds for Cultivated Meat Production.

Mariana P Hanga, Simona Fehlmann, Nicole Kleger, Maria Laura Vieri, Travis Callue, Alice Millbank, Eirini Theodosiou

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mariana P HangaDepartment of Biochemical Engineering, University College London, London, UK. m.hanga@ucl.ac.uk.
Simona FehlmannSallea AG, Zürich, Switzerland.
Nicole KlegerSallea AG, Zürich, Switzerland.
Maria Laura VieriDepartment of Biochemical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Travis CallueDepartment of Biochemical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Alice MillbankSchool of Engineering and Innovation, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Eirini TheodosiouSchool of Engineering and Innovation, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scaffolds are customisable three-dimensional supports that are compatible with cell culture and thus suitable for a wide range of applications. One emerging application is cultivated meat production. Due to the complexity of cultivated meat products, multiple types of scaffolds would be required for the different manufacturing steps involved. Additionally, as cultivated meat is a food product intended for consumption, there are further requirements in the scaffold's material, properties and method of preparation that are necessary to achieve suitability for use in foods, as well as regulatory requirements for safe use. This chapter focuses on edible scaffolds with applicability in cultivated meat production, exploring established and emerging materials suitable for use in foods, methods for scaffold creation, as well as different types of scaffolds and the diverse roles they play across various stages of the manufacturing process.

Indexed as

MeatTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsHumansIn Vitro MeatMeat SubstitutesBiomaterialsCultivated meatFood-gradeScaffolds

Identifiers

PMID41087813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.