Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41087776›Full record

ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2025

Recent Advances in Oral Immunotherapy for Food Allergies.

Sakura Sato, Ken-Ichi Nagakura, Noriyuki Yanagida, Motohiro Ebisawa

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Recent advances in allergen immunotherapy.Chinese medical journal · 2026
    Review
  3. Predictive Biomarkers for Sustained Unresponsiveness Following Oral Immunotherapy.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2026
    Article
  4. Hazelnut oral immunotherapy in children: An Italian single-center retrospective cohort study.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sakura SatoDepartment of Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, NHO Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan. ssakura8010@foodallergy.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3674-0759
Ken-Ichi NagakuraDepartment of Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, NHO Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9381-9044
Noriyuki YanagidaDepartment of Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, NHO Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9643-744X
Motohiro EbisawaDepartment of Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, NHO Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4117-558X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food allergies affect 6-8% of children worldwide and can significantly impact quality of life, with potentially severe reactions including anaphylaxis. Over recent decades, oral immunotherapy (OIT) has emerged as a treatment option for food allergies, but safety concerns with conventional high-dose protocols have limited its broader adoption. Low-dose OIT protocols have been developed to address these safety issues while maintaining therapeutic efficacy. This review focuses specifically on low-dose OIT protocols, their clinical outcomes, and evidence-based patient selection strategies. Low-dose OIT has demonstrated efficacy for several food allergens via successful desensitization and sustained unresponsiveness (SU). Clinical trials have reported SU achievements of 33-50% for milk, up to 71% for eggs, 25-37.5% for wheat, and 33-74% for peanut allergies after treatment. Notably, these protocols have shown improved safety profiles compared to conventional higher dose approaches, with substantially reduced rates of severe adverse reactions. Long-term follow-up studies of up to 6 years have shown progressively improving SU rates and a decrease in adverse events over time, supporting the durability of low-dose approaches. Critical factors for successful low-dose OIT implementation include appropriate patient selection based on age, risk stratification, and individual clinical characteristics. Integration with biological agents such as omalizumab may further enhance safety and efficacy in selected high-risk patients. While low-dose OIT offers a safer therapeutic option for persistent food allergies, careful patient selection remains essential to optimize treatment outcomes and minimize risks.

Indexed as

AllergensDesensitization, ImmunologicFood HypersensitivityAdministration, OralAnimalsHumansTreatment OutcomeAllergensAdverse reactionDesensitizationFood allergyOral immunotherapySustained unresponsiveness

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.