Ensuring effective removal of transgenes before release of genome-edited crops.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. N-glycosylation code diversifies paralogous chitinases to balance plant immunity and growth.Nature plants · 2026
   Article
2. Evolution and implementation of EU regulation on new genomic techniques.Nature plants · 2026
   Article
3. Bridging precision agriculture and human medicine through comparative genetics.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
   Review
4. Moderately ectopic expressing NLP27 in potato confers high disease resistance without yield penalty.Plant cell reports · 2026
   Article
5. Methylviologen resistance in loss-of-function mutants of the polyamine transporter gene OsLAT5.PloS one · 2026
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.