ArticleNature genetics2025
Activity-based selection for enhanced base editor mutational scanning.
Article in Nature genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strategies and mechanisms of precision genome engineering: From gene editing to genome writing.iMetaOmics · 2026Review
- Prime editing in neuropsychiatric disorders: From mutation-specific target selection to clinical translation.Neuroprotection (Chichester, England) · 2026Review
- Uncovering functional variants using a high-efficiency PE3-based screening platform.Science advances · 2026Article
- Prime Editing Driven Functional Genomics: Bridging Genotype to Phenotype in the Post-Genomic Era.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- High-efficiency TadA cytosine base editors for precise modelling of human disease variants.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Computational modeling of human genetic variants in mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Base editing is a CRISPR-based technology that enables high-throughput, nucleotide-level functional interrogation of the genome that is essential for understanding the genetic basis of human disease and informing therapeutic development. Base editing screens have emerged as a powerful experimental approach, yet significant cell-to-cell variability in editing efficiency introduces noise that may obscure meaningful results. Here we develop a co-selection method that enriches for cells with high base editing activity, substantially increasing editing efficiency at a target locus. We evaluate this activity-based selection method against a traditional screening approach by tiling guide RNAs across TP53, demonstrating its enhanced capacity to pinpoint specific mutations and protein regions of functional importance. We anticipate that this modular selection method will enhance the resolution of base editing screens across many applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41087678What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.