ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2026
Prevalence of hypertension and related factors among suspected hypertensive medical personnel during COVID-19 vaccination.
Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Implementation Hypertension" in the pandemic era: unmasking white-coat effects in healthcare workers.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Comment on "Prevalence of hypertension and related factors among suspected hypertensive medical personnel during COVID-19 vaccination".Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic prompted widespread opportunistic screening, identifying numerous individuals with implemental hypertension (IH), particularly among medical personnel. However, the true prevalence of sustained hypertension (SH) versus white coat hypertension (WCH) in this high-stress context remains poorly defined. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and predictors of WCH, demonstrating the critical role of digital hypertension tools. This cross-sectional study enrolled 200 medical personnel at Srinagarind Hospital (April-July 2021) with a screening clinic BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg and no prior HT diagnosis. All participants performed 7-day home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) for definitive diagnosis. SH was defined as an average home BP ≥ 135/85 mmHg, and WCH as <135/85 mmHg. Multivariate logistic regression identified predictive factors. Among 200 participants (71% female, median age 45.0 years), a striking 80% (n = 160) had WCH, while only 20% (n = 40) had SH. Female gender was an independent predictor of WCH (adjusted OR = 2.56, 95% CI = 1.09-6.02), whereas older age, higher BMI, and a family history of HT were independent predictors of SH. In conclusion, the vast majority of medical personnel with implemental hypertension had WCH, revealing a profound white coat effect. This finding serves as a critical warning for IH programs, highlighting that without systematic confirmation via digital tools like HBPM, such initiatives risk widespread misdiagnosis and unnecessary treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41087671What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.