Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41087639›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2025

Association between high- and low-voltage electrical injuries and adverse outcomes: a propensity-matched analysis (2002-2022).

Huayu Yang, Ni Zhen, Meifang Liu, Wei Zhu, Zichen Yang, Cheng Zhang, Zhiqiang Yuan, Tingmin Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Huayu Yang *State Key Laboratory of Trauma and Chemical Poisoning of China, Institute of Burn Research, Southwest Hospital (the First Affiliated Hospital), Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), 29# Gao Tan Yan Street, Sha Ping Ba District, Chongqing, 400038, China.
Ni Zhen *State Key Laboratory of Trauma and Chemical Poisoning of China, Institute of Burn Research, Southwest Hospital (the First Affiliated Hospital), Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), 29# Gao Tan Yan Street, Sha Ping Ba District, Chongqing, 400038, China.
Meifang LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Southwest Hospital (the First Affiliated Hospital), Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Gao Tan Yan Street, Chongqing, 400038, China.
Wei ZhuState Key Laboratory of Trauma and Chemical Poisoning of China, Institute of Burn Research, Southwest Hospital (the First Affiliated Hospital), Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), 29# Gao Tan Yan Street, Sha Ping Ba District, Chongqing, 400038, China.
Zichen YangState Key Laboratory of Trauma and Chemical Poisoning of China, Institute of Burn Research, Southwest Hospital (the First Affiliated Hospital), Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), 29# Gao Tan Yan Street, Sha Ping Ba District, Chongqing, 400038, China.
Cheng ZhangState Key Laboratory of Trauma and Chemical Poisoning of China, Institute of Burn Research, Southwest Hospital (the First Affiliated Hospital), Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), 29# Gao Tan Yan Street, Sha Ping Ba District, Chongqing, 400038, China.
Zhiqiang Yuan *State Key Laboratory of Trauma and Chemical Poisoning of China, Institute of Burn Research, Southwest Hospital (the First Affiliated Hospital), Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), 29# Gao Tan Yan Street, Sha Ping Ba District, Chongqing, 400038, China. yuanzq@tmmu.edu.cn.
Tingmin Liu *State Key Laboratory of Trauma and Chemical Poisoning of China, Institute of Burn Research, Southwest Hospital (the First Affiliated Hospital), Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), 29# Gao Tan Yan Street, Sha Ping Ba District, Chongqing, 400038, China. ltm@tmmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0009-0008-2120-0876

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrical injuries often result in severe consequences, posing significant challenges for post-injury treatment. However, there is currently a lack of large-scale and in-depth retrospective studies on the prognosis of electrical injuries. This study was conducted to analyze in depth the clinical prognosis associated with high-voltage and low-voltage electrical injuries. This retrospective study incorporated patients who had suffered from electrical injuries and were admitted to the Burn Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University within the past two decades. Patients were categorized into a high-voltage group (n = 772) and a low-voltage group (n = 654) based on voltage levels. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to adjust for baseline characteristic discrepancies between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis, Linear regression analysis, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were utilized to evaluate electrical injury outcomes. The primary outcomes encompassed all-cause mortality, 14-day mortality, and amputation incidence. Secondary outcomes included burn severity metrics, comprising burn area, length of hospital stay, and the number of surgeries. Adverse events, including disturbance of consciousness and requirement for tracheotomy, were also evaluated. The study included a total of 1426 patients, with 772 cases of high-voltage electrical injuries and 654 cases of low-voltage electrical injuries. After propensity score matching (PSM), 506 pairs of patients were successfully matched. The analysis demonstrated that, compared to low-voltage injuries, high-voltage electrical injuries were significantly associated with higher amputation rates (OR: 3.02; 95% CI 2.22-4.11; P < 0.001), higher 14-day mortality (HR: 5.40; 95% CI 1.20-24.36; P = 0.01), longer hospital stays (beta: 34.75; 95% CI 24.88-44.62; P < 0.001), larger burn areas (beta: 8.00; 95% CI 6.58-9.43; P < 0.001), and undergoing two or more surgeries (OR: 1.72; 95% CI 1.33-2.23; P < 0.001). Additionally, high-voltage is a significant risk factor for disturbance of consciousness (OR: 2.34; 95% CI 1.78-3.07; P < 0.001) and the requirement for tracheotomy (OR: 11.50; 95% CI 2.71-48.78; P < 0.001). However, no significant correlation was observed between high-voltage injuries and all-cause mortality (P > 0.05). Although high-voltage electrical injuries do not increase all-cause mortality during hospitalization, patients experience higher early mortality (within 14 days), more severe symptoms, and poorer prognoses. Therefore, greater emphasis should be placed on the hazards of high-voltage electrical injuries.

Indexed as

Electric InjuriesAdultFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLength of StayLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesAmputationBurn outcomesElectrical injuriesHigh-voltage

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.