Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41087636›Full record

ArticleProtoplasma2026

Linking genome size to life form and community structure in a semi-natural landscape from Northeast India.

Alok Senapati, Debaditya Gupta, Bimal K Chetri, Nihal Gujre, Sudip Mitra, Latha Rangan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Protoplasma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alok SenapatiDepartment of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, North Guwahati, Assam, 781039, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5479-2515
Debaditya GuptaSchool of Agro & Rural Technology, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, North Guwahati, Assam, 781039, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2712-6482
Bimal K ChetriSchool of Agro & Rural Technology, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, North Guwahati, Assam, 781039, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2154-7676
Nihal GujreSchool of Agro & Rural Technology, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, North Guwahati, Assam, 781039, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2429-5478
Sudip MitraSchool of Agro & Rural Technology, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, North Guwahati, Assam, 781039, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1838-8264
Latha RanganDepartment of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, North Guwahati, Assam, 781039, India. latha_rangan@yahoo.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3593-157X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Northeast India, a global biodiversity hotspot, harbors exceptional plant diversity within the Indo-Burma region. This study provides the first comprehensive integration of floristic, ecological, and genomic analyses of angiosperm diversity in North Guwahati, Assam, using the Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati campus as a model semi-natural landscape. Systematic year-long surveys recorded 434 angiosperm species belonging to 312 genera and 101 families, including 70 trees, 86 shrubs, and 244 herbs (with 31 climbers and a few aquatics). Poaceae was the most species-rich family (34 species), followed by Fabaceae (29) and Cyperaceae (26), reflecting typical tropical diversity. Spatial analysis revealed strong habitat-specific species distribution, with open plains supporting the highest diversity (206 species) and forest edges harboring rare taxa. Community structure across four ecological zones showed significant spatial heterogeneity, with Zone 1 having the highest Shannon-Wiener diversity (H' = 4.084) and Zone 4 the highest evenness (E = 0.905). Nuclear DNA content (2C values) was estimated via flow cytometry for 110 species, contributing 58 novel genome size records and revealing a 98-fold variation (0.43-42.5 pg). Monocots had significantly larger genomes than dicots (4.79 vs. 1.63 pg, p < 0.001), and ecological trends showed a progressive increase in genome size from herbaceous (1.93 pg) to woody forms (2.50 pg), supporting the large genome constraint hypothesis. GIS mapping integrated taxonomic, ecological, and genomic data, uncovering spatial patterns in diversity and genome evolution. region. This comprehensive framework provides a crucial foundation for assessing biodiversity and guiding conservation efforts in this ecologically important region.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantGenome SizeBiodiversityEcosystemIndiaAngiosperm diversityCommunity structureFlow cytometryNortheast IndiaNuclear DNA contentSpatial analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.