ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Timing of cholecystectomy after mild biliary pancreatitis: same-admission versus interval cholecystectomy.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAcute pancreatitis, Inflammation of the pancreas, is a leading gastroenterology-related cause of hospital admissions and contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality in the United States. The treatment for acute gallstone pancreatitis, whose etiology is biliary pancreatitis, is cholecystectomy. It has been proven that gallbladder removal reduces the chances of recurrent gallstone-related complications. However, the question about the timing of the surgery is whether in the same hospitalization (within 72 h) or upon later timing. Thus, we decided to compare same-admission and interval cholecystectomy, hypothesizing that interval cholecystectomy would not increase the risk of recurrent gallstone-related complications. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective population-based cohort study. In the current study, we will utilize the database of Surgery A to detect and define biliary pancreatitis cases. STUDY POPULATION: Patients who have undergone cholecystectomy as treatment of biliary pancreatitis cases treated at Soroka University Medical Center from 2017 through 2024. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The comparison of groups was conducted using Pearson Chi-square for categorical variables and Fisher's exact test for dichotomous variables when applicable. Quantitative variables were compared using parametric and a-parametric tests. The probability value has been set as P < 0.05, and a multiple variable analysis will be conducted using logistical regression to pinpoint if the timing of surgery. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: One hundred forty-one patients met the criteria and were entered into the analysis. Primary analysis has shown that there was no difference between the two groups regarding basic demographics and has shown no significant difference between the groups. Like that, we did not find any significant difference between the groups regarding hospitalization days, complications, and re-admission. Thus, we conclude that even though we still advocate for the early and same-admission protocol for treating mild acute pancreatitis, if needed (due to reasons like COVID, war, etc.), one can delay the operation with no dire consequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41087575What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.