ArticleScientific reports2025
SpinachXAI-Rec: a multi-stage explainable AI framework for spinach freshness classification and consumer recommendation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal CT Scanning for Explainable Early Detection of Postharvest Disorders: The 'Braeburn' Browning Case.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- A hybrid CNN model for multi-class freshness and disease detection in local spinach varieties.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leafy vegetables such as spinach are among the most important components in a nutritious diet but are highly perishable and susceptible to premature spoilage. Traditional practices in determining freshness have been qualitative and time-consuming and have consistently led to defective consumption decisions with unintended consequences on human health. To this issue, we introduce SpinachXAI-Rec, a multistage framework that is enabled by AI and is capable of automating the classification of spinach freshness and providing consumer recommendations. This framework is based on understandable deep learning. To guarantee class balance and feature diversity, a dataset consisting of 4005 original images of three spinach varieties (Malabar, Red, and Water) was expanded to 12,000 images (2000 per class across six categories: fresh and non-fresh). We trained three CNN architectures, DenseNet121, ResNet50, and EfficientNetB0, on the Stage 1 augmented dataset. In performance, we saw DenseNet121 significantly outperform with 96% classification accuracy compared to ResNet50 (53%) and EfficientNetB0 (17%). Stage 2 improved representation of features by incorporating DenseNet121 embeddings and ViT-B/16 and Swin Transformer attention mechanisms. DenseNet121 + ViT-B/16 obtained an F1-score of 0.95, which was further optimised to 0.97 in Stage 3 using a multiclass SVM classifier. GradCAM++ and LIME were employed to incorporate interpretability during Stage 4. LIME provided transparent explanations of the significance of class-specific features, while GradCAM++ effectively highlighted disease-affected or spoilt regions. The most effective model (DenseNet121 + ViT + SVM) also obtained a Dice coefficient of 0.89 and an IoU of 0.82, which confirms the precision of localisation and segmentation. Finally, Stage 5 introduces a clinical recommender system that is based on rules and relates prediction confidence to real-world categories: Eatable, Eatable with Caution, or Not Eatable. This AI-driven recommendation assists food purveyors and consumers in making health-conscious, well-informed decisions. SpinachXAI-Rec is a significant advancement in the development of safer food systems, as it provides interpretable AI for the purpose of freshness validation and actionable consumption recommendations, thereby empowering both consumers and industry stakeholders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.