ArticleCommunications medicine2025
Predicting arrhythmia recurrence post-ablation in atrial fibrillation using explainable machine learning.
Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Driven Atrial Fibrillation Management: From Signal to Strategy.Balkan medical journal · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Cardiac Neuromodulation: Mechanisms, Applications, and Pathways to Clinical Translation.Journal of arrhythmia · 2026Review
- Three-Dimensional Left Atrial Geometry in Atrial Fibrillation: Imaging Biomarkers, Substrate Phenotyping, and Ablation Outcome Prediction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Circulating microRNAs in Atrial Fibrillation: Clinical Significance and Future Perspectives.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Atrial fibrillation type-specific prediction of recurrence after catheter ablation: the pivotal role of right atrial remodeling revealed by explainable machine learning.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- A paradigm shift toward full-cycle management of atrial fibrillation: integrating digital twins and artificial intelligence.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Novel predictors of late recurrence after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: from biomarkers to artificial intelligence models.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Managing Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure: In Whom, When, and How?International journal of heart failure · 2026Review
- Predicting arrhythmia recurrence post-ablation in atrial fibrillation using explainable machine learning.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in atrial fibrillation - Timely diagnosis, risk assessment and personalized management.Indian pacing and electrophysiology journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFollowing atrial fibrillation ablation, it is challenging to distinguish patients who will remain arrhythmia-free from those at risk for recurrence. New explainable machine learning (xML) techniques allow for systematic assessment of arrhythmia recurrence risk following catheter ablation. We aim to develop an xML algorithm that predicts recurrence and reveals key risk factors to facilitate better follow-up strategy after an ablation procedure.
methodsWe reconstructed pre-and post-ablation models of the left atrium (LA) from late gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance (LGE-MRI) for 67 patients. Patient-specific features (LGE-based measurements of pre/post-ablation arrhythmogenic substrate, LA geometry metrics, computational simulation results, and clinical risk factors) trained a random forest classifier to predict recurrent arrhythmia. We calculated each risk factor's marginal contribution to model decision making via SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).
resultsThe classifier accurately predicts post-ablation arrhythmia recurrence (mean receiver operating characteristic [ROC] area under the curve [AUC]: 0.80 ± 0.04; mean precision-recall [PR] AUC: 0.82 ± 0.08). SHAP analysis reveals that of 89 features tested, the key population risk factors for recurrence are: large left atrium, low LGE-quantified post-ablation scar in the atrial floor region, and previous attempts at direct current cardioversion. We also examine patient-specific recurrence predictions, since xML allows us to understand why a particular individual can have large prediction weights for some categories without tipping the balance towards an incorrect prediction. Finally, we validate our model in a completely new, 15-patient retrospective holdout cohort (80% correct).
conclusionOur SHAP-based explainable machine learning approach is a proof-of-concept clinical tool to explain arrhythmia recurrence risk in patients who underwent ablation by combining patient-specific clinical profiles and LGE-derived data.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.