Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41087542›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2025

Predicting arrhythmia recurrence post-ablation in atrial fibrillation using explainable machine learning.

Savannah F Bifulco, Matthew J Magoon, Yaacoub Chahine, Issac Kim, Fima Macheret, Nazem Akoum, Patrick M Boyle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Savannah F Bifulco *Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Matthew J Magoon *Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5947-3772
Yaacoub ChahineDivision of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Issac KimDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Fima MacheretDivision of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Nazem AkoumDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. nakoum@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2001-6806
Patrick M BoyleDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. pmjboyle@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9048-1239

Funding

University of Washington Medical Scientist Training Program: MD/PhDT32GM007266 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HORWITZ, MARSHALL S. · 1985 to 2023
$30.4M
University of Washington Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM153182 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MARSHALL S. HORWITZ · 2024 to 2026
$5.3M
Bioengineering Cardiovascular Training GrantT32EB001650 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI REGNIER, MICHAEL · 2004 to 2019
$3.6M
Molecular Determinants of Usual Interstitial Pneumonia (UIP)R01HL158668 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI David Albert Schwartz, Ivana V Yang · 2022 to 2026
$3.5M
Mechanistic Relationships Between Fibrosis, Fibrillation, and Stroke: Multi-Scale, Multi-Physics SimulationsR01HL158667 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Patrick M Boyle · 2022 to 2026
$3.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL158667NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL158668NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB001650NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007266NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM153182U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) R01HL158668U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) T32EB001650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing atrial fibrillation ablation, it is challenging to distinguish patients who will remain arrhythmia-free from those at risk for recurrence. New explainable machine learning (xML) techniques allow for systematic assessment of arrhythmia recurrence risk following catheter ablation. We aim to develop an xML algorithm that predicts recurrence and reveals key risk factors to facilitate better follow-up strategy after an ablation procedure.

methodsWe reconstructed pre-and post-ablation models of the left atrium (LA) from late gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance (LGE-MRI) for 67 patients. Patient-specific features (LGE-based measurements of pre/post-ablation arrhythmogenic substrate, LA geometry metrics, computational simulation results, and clinical risk factors) trained a random forest classifier to predict recurrent arrhythmia. We calculated each risk factor's marginal contribution to model decision making via SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).

resultsThe classifier accurately predicts post-ablation arrhythmia recurrence (mean receiver operating characteristic [ROC] area under the curve [AUC]: 0.80 ± 0.04; mean precision-recall [PR] AUC: 0.82 ± 0.08). SHAP analysis reveals that of 89 features tested, the key population risk factors for recurrence are: large left atrium, low LGE-quantified post-ablation scar in the atrial floor region, and previous attempts at direct current cardioversion. We also examine patient-specific recurrence predictions, since xML allows us to understand why a particular individual can have large prediction weights for some categories without tipping the balance towards an incorrect prediction. Finally, we validate our model in a completely new, 15-patient retrospective holdout cohort (80% correct).

conclusionOur SHAP-based explainable machine learning approach is a proof-of-concept clinical tool to explain arrhythmia recurrence risk in patients who underwent ablation by combining patient-specific clinical profiles and LGE-derived data.

Identifiers

PMID41087542
PMCPMC12521406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.