ArticleScientific reports2025
Associations between systemic inflammation response index and abdominal aortic calcification: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The relationship between Systemic Inflammation Response Index (SIRI) and abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) remains unexplored. Data from the 2013-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) cohort were analyzed. AAC and severe AAC (SAAC) were quantified using the Kauppila scoring system. Multivariate linear and logistic regression were applied to examine the correlation between SIRI and AAC scores, as well as SIRI and SAAC. The predictive value of SIRI and the Systemic Immune Inflammatory Index (SII) for SAAC was compared using ROC curves and Delong test. A nomogram model for SAAC prediction was also constructed. A total of 3,047 participants were included. Results showed a significant positive association between SIRI and higher AAC scores, with scores increasing progressively across higher SIRI quartiles. A similar positive trend was observed between SIRI and SAAC prevalence. Subgroup analysis revealed that the relationship between SIRI and AAC scores was stronger in the elderly. The SAAC predictive model, incorporating SIRI and other factors, achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86 in the training set and 0.81 in the validation set. This study suggests that higher SIRI is positively associated with both AAC and SAAC, with superior predictive value for SAAC compared to SII.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.