ArticleScientific reports2025
Prediction of preterm birth from cervical length measurements in twin pregnancies using machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple Cervical Length (CL) measurements are typically acquired throughout the course of twin pregnancy to detect the early stages of labour and identify pregnancies at a high risk of preterm delivery. This study uses Machine-Learning (ML) approaches to determine the optimal timing of repeated CL measurements when used for predicting spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) in twin pregnancies. Serial CL measurements from ultrasounds performed between 16 and 28 weeks of gestation were retrospectively acquired from 2,095 patients carrying twin pregnancies. These measurements were used for creating several CL feature sets, which were subsequently evaluated for their utility in predicting PTB < 37, sPTB < 37, sPTB < 34, and sPTB < 32 weeks. The highest accuracies for predicting sPTB < 37, sPTB < 34, and sPTB < 32 were found for the Logistic Regression model, which performed at 58%, 63%, and 73%, respectively. Post-hoc analysis showed that using multiple CL measurements did not significantly improve the sPTB prediction accuracy, irrespective of the ML model. Specifically, a single CL measurement at 18-20 weeks of gestation was sufficient for predicting sPTB < 32 weeks with the same accuracy. Future work should expand patient cohorts by including early CL measurements and investigating the time between a CL exam and sPTB from a regression standpoint.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.