Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41087503›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning based dynamic trust estimation framework for Securing wireless sensor networks.

Prafull Goswami, Tayyab Khan, Vinay Pathak, Abdulatif Alabdultif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Prafull GoswamiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Information Technology Sonepat, Haryana, India.
Tayyab KhanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Information Technology Sonepat, Haryana, India. tayyabkhan.cse2012@gmail.com.
Vinay PathakDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Information Technology Sonepat, Haryana, India.
Abdulatif AlabdultifDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer, Qassim University, Buraydah, 52571, Saudi Arabia. ab.alabdulatif@qu.edu.sa.

Funding

Qassim University, Saudi Arabia QU-APC-2025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) face significant challenges, such as security threats, and susceptibility to various internal and external attacks, impacting data integrity and network reliability. Trust-aware machine learning (ML) based security frameworks are vital solutions to overcome these challenges by improving security, decision-making, accuracy, and attack detection. These models utilizes ML to actively monitor trust levels, enhancing accuracy of malicious behavior detection and strengthening network security and integrity. In this context, we propose a Secure Machine-learning-based Adaptive Reliable Trust (SMART) model, suitable for unattended autonomous WSN environment. The proposed SMART model provides enhanced security and accuracy through fast and trustworthy dynamic generation of trust values. The proposed SMART model uses a novel ML algorithm that derives multiple trust features such as Co-Location Relationship (CLR), Co-Work Relationship (CWR), and Cooperativeness-Frequency-Duration (CFD). These features together give rise to an proactive trust score for sensor nodes, enabling predictions of likely misbehavior and allows for informed decisions regarding the reliability of individual sensor devices. Furthermore, SMART framework approach utilizes both immediate (direct) trust and derived (indirect) trust, making use of logical time windows to systematically watch for honest and suspicious interactions. SMART utilizes an efficient K-means clustering algorithm to assign data points to the nearest K-centers, optimizing cluster identification. Furthermore, It utilizes Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for significant variance identification and makes use of an SVM-based method for dimension reduction and accurate decision-making with lower time and space complexity. Performance measures such as accuracy, F1-score, recall, FNR, malicious SD detection, and trust value change measure its performance. Simulation results confirm that the SMART model can identify malicious nodes with a detection rate of 96%, FNR of 0.7%, F1-Score of 0.75, and accuracy of 96% even when there are 50 malicious nodes. This confirms the ability of the SMART model to enhance the trustworthiness and security of WSNs considerably.

Indexed as

DependabilityMachine learningMalicious nodesReliabilitySecurityTrust evaluationTrust features

Identifiers

PMID41087503
PMCPMC12521643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.