Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41087502›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Attentional focus strategies and motor performance in young adolescents investigating role of task difficulty.

Golnoosh M Abdi, Rasool Abedanzadeh, Seyyed Mohammadreza Mousavi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Golnoosh M AbdiDepartment of Motor Behavior and Sport Psychology, Sport Sciences Faculty, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.
Rasool AbedanzadehDepartment of Motor Behavior and Sport Psychology, Sport Sciences Faculty, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran. r.abedanzadeh@scu.ac.ir.
Seyyed Mohammadreza MousaviDepartment of Motor Behavior, Sport Sciences Faculty, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attentional focus plays a crucial role in motor performance; however, its impact on young adolescent females across varying task difficulties remains unclear. This study aims to answer the following question: how do attentional focus strategies affect motor performance in young adolescents, and does task difficulty modify this effect? A sample of 112 healthy girls aged 10-12 years (M = 10.98, SD = 0.82) was randomly assigned to one of four conditions: external focus (focus on the part of the ball contacted during the kick), holistic focus (focus on feeling solid contact during the kick), internal focus (focus on the part of the foot making contact during the kick), or control (no focus instruction). Participants completed 40 soccer kicking trials under two levels of task difficulty: kicking a stationary ball and kicking a moving ball. Findings revealed that under low task difficulty, performance was significantly better with an external focus compared to an internal focus (p = .001), and no instruction (p = .004). Similarly, a holistic focus led to significantly better performance than an internal focus (p = .0001) and no instruction (p = .0001). However, under higher task difficulty, only the holistic focus group sustained superior performance, outperforming all other groups (p ≤ .05). These results highlight the moderating role of task difficulty in attentional focus research and suggest the potential advantages of holistic focus in complex motor tasks.

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceAttentionMotor SkillsPsychomotor PerformanceAdolescentChildFemaleHumansSoccerTask Performance and AnalysisAttentional focusTask difficultyYoung adolescents

Identifiers

PMID41087502
PMCPMC12521493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.