ArticleScientific reports2025
Sustainable and cost-efficient machining of ZE41 magnesium alloy through optimization with Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A hybrid RSM-Spherical Fuzzy AHP-Fuzzy VIKOR approach for optimizing drilling of AM60 magnesium alloy using biodegradable MQL.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multi-criteria wear performance optimization of waste-reinforced hybrid aluminum alloys via RSM, Fuzzy AHP, and Fuzzy WASPAS.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A novel sustainable hybrid intuitionistic fuzzy decision-making model for machinability ranking of Al-Cu-Mg-SiC-graphite-peanut shell hybrid composites.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Experimental investigation and optimization of mechanical and tribological performances of bio-based sustainable hybrid composites incorporating Nano-SiO₂ fillers.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development of a novel integrated RSM-Fuzzy MCDA framework for high-speed machinability assessment of WAAM-Fabricated aluminium.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study addresses the pressing need to reduce production costs and energy consumption in machining lightweight magnesium alloys, a challenge that has gained significance with the growing emphasis on sustainable manufacturing. Although ZE41 magnesium alloy is widely used in aerospace and automotive applications due to its excellent strength-to-weight ratio, limited research has explored integrated cost-energy optimization in its machining. To bridge this gap, a novel Intuitionistic Fuzzy Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (IF-TOPSIS) was employed to evaluate and optimize four critical machining parameters-cutting speed, feed per tooth, depth of cut, and tool diameter-each varied at three levels. Experimental trials were conducted using industrially relevant cost and energy data. The optimization framework was further validated using ANOVA, sensitivity analysis, confirmation experiments, and product quality checks, including dimensional accuracy, surface finish, and mechanical integrity. The optimized parameter set (cutting speed 550 m/min, feed 0.6125 mm/tooth, depth of cut 2.5 mm, and tool diameter 25 mm) yielded a production cost of 50.04 INR/part and energy consumption of 0.0000045 kWh/part. Compared with the least efficient condition, these values represent improvements of 30.7% in cost and 25% in energy efficiency. Tool diameter and feed per tooth were identified as the most influential factors, with prediction-experiment deviations remaining within ± 5%. This work demonstrates, for the first time, the effectiveness of IF-TOPSIS in simultaneously addressing economic and environmental objectives in machining. The proposed framework offers a validated pathway for sustainable and cost-effective ZE41 machining, with potential for broader industrial adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.