ArticleScientific reports2025
A comprehensive model for characterizing Chinese female facial skin laxity by expert assessment, consumer perception, and noninvasive skin physiological parameters.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study used expert assessment, consumer perception, and noninvasive measurements of skin physiological parameters to develop a mathematical model for characterizing facial skin laxity in Chinese females, providing the scientific basis for personalized beauty and skin-firming strategies. The study involved 64 Chinese females (18-60 years) whose facial regions were imaged using VISIA-CR. Five experts assessed facial skin laxity using VISIA-CR images, while 72 consumers compared paired images to identify higher laxity. Noninvasive measurements of skin elasticity and other parameters were taken. The data were analyzed using Bradley-Terry analysis and support vector machine regression modeling. Consistent with expectations, facial skin laxity was negatively correlated with skin elasticity R2 values and positively correlated with skin elasticity F4 values. A novel Facial Skin Laxity Index (FSLI) was introduced to evaluate product efficacy in reducing laxity. Facial skin laxity can be characterized and quantified using a combination of expert assessments, consumer perceptions, and noninvasive measurements. The FSLI enables precise evaluation of product performance in improving facial skin laxity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.