ArticleScientific reports2025
Understanding the regulatory grammar of sepsis-causing Staphylococcus aureus bacteria using contexualised DNA language models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Closing the sepsis gap: from molecular mechanisms to scalable bedside care.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- From Glycocalyx Shedding to Microvascular Collapse in Sepsis: Endothelial Pathophysiology, Organ Dysfunction, and Mechanistic Biomarkers.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2026Review
- Understanding the regulatory grammar of sepsis-causing Staphylococcus aureus bacteria using contexualised DNA language models.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To efficiently and accurately understand, detect, and treat sepsis, we require a deep understanding of how its underlying biological systems work. Conventional methods struggle to provide a detailed view of both the functional and regulatory elements orchestrating a system-wide response to pathogenic infection. Our approach was to use a streamlined process: First, we used multi-omics integration to create a functional-omics signature at the single molecule level, employing sparse Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (sPLSDA). Then, we turned to genome Natural Language Processing (genomeNLP) to identify correlated features and discover regulatory motifs in bacterial promoters. This novel method utilised specialised language models trained on DNA sequences. Our approach is distinct from traditional methods as we did not rely on predefined biomarkers and motifs or focus solely on short-range context. As a result, we (a) pinpointed multi-omics signatures with single molecule-level precision and (b) uncovered regulatory patterns for both novel and established regulatory motifs governing the omics signature. Ultimately, we presented a comprehensive systems-level view of five sepsis-causing Staphylococcus aureus bacterial strains, revealing hierarchical gene regulation in genome structure, ncRNA control, metabolism, and antibiotic resistance. We additionally note that our approach is agnostic to organism type and can be applied outside of a sepsis system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.