Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41087476›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A comparative evaluation of multiple machine learning approaches for forecasting dengue outbreaks in Bangladesh.

Bowen Liu, Md Farhad Hossain, Shaheed Hossain

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Forecasting and Early Warning Systems for Dengue Outbreaks: Updated Narrative Review.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bowen LiuDivision of Computing, Analytics, and Mathematics, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, School of Science and Engineering, University of Missouri - Kansas City, Kansas, MO, 64110, USA.
Md Farhad HossainDepartment of Mathematical Science, The University of Texas at Dallas, Texas, 75080-3021, USA. mxh220100@utdallas.edu.
Shaheed HossainDepartment of Statistics, Comilla University, Cumilla, 3506, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to forecast dengue incidence in Bangladesh by applying and comparing machine learning techniques. Dengue surveillance data from January 1, 2022, to December 1, 2023, for five divisions of Bangladesh was obtained from the Directorate General of Health Services. Initial time series analysis showed distinct trends and seasonality. Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (SARIMA), Multi-Layer Perceptron neural networks, XGBoost, and Support Vector Regression (SVR) were implemented for modeling and forecasting monthly dengue cases for each division. The models were evaluated using error metrics like RMSE, MAE, and MAPE. The results indicate that XGBoost provided the most accurate forecasts with the lowest errors overall. For the Dhaka division, which had the most data, XGBoost captured seasonality and trends well, with an RMSE of 109, an MAE of 127, and an MAPE of 12.9%. SARIMA models were reasonably good but had higher errors than the machine learning models. SVR was found unsuitable for forecasting this data. In summary, advanced machine learning models like XGBoost proved effective for infectious disease forecasting using limited surveillance data in resource-constrained settings. The forecasts can assist public health planning in Bangladesh.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDengueMachine LearningBangladeshBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsDisease OutbreaksForecastingHumansHumidityMultilayer PerceptronsRainSupport Vector MachineTemperatureWeatherDengueForecastingMachine learningNeural networksSARIMASVRXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID41087476
PMCPMC12521351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.