ArticleScientific reports2025
A comparative evaluation of multiple machine learning approaches for forecasting dengue outbreaks in Bangladesh.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging ensemble model and public health practice: an approach for refining understanding of seasonal dengue transmission patterns in Bangladesh.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Climate-Driven Advanced Machine Learning Approach for Dengue Incidence Forecasting in Bangladesh.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Forecasting and Early Warning Systems for Dengue Outbreaks: Updated Narrative Review.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to forecast dengue incidence in Bangladesh by applying and comparing machine learning techniques. Dengue surveillance data from January 1, 2022, to December 1, 2023, for five divisions of Bangladesh was obtained from the Directorate General of Health Services. Initial time series analysis showed distinct trends and seasonality. Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (SARIMA), Multi-Layer Perceptron neural networks, XGBoost, and Support Vector Regression (SVR) were implemented for modeling and forecasting monthly dengue cases for each division. The models were evaluated using error metrics like RMSE, MAE, and MAPE. The results indicate that XGBoost provided the most accurate forecasts with the lowest errors overall. For the Dhaka division, which had the most data, XGBoost captured seasonality and trends well, with an RMSE of 109, an MAE of 127, and an MAPE of 12.9%. SARIMA models were reasonably good but had higher errors than the machine learning models. SVR was found unsuitable for forecasting this data. In summary, advanced machine learning models like XGBoost proved effective for infectious disease forecasting using limited surveillance data in resource-constrained settings. The forecasts can assist public health planning in Bangladesh.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.