ArticleScientific reports2025
HGOA-based framework for multi-objective optimization and performance prediction of PEM fuel cells.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article presents a new Hybrid Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm (HGOA) that can be used to model Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells (PEMFCs) with high accuracy and optimize multi-objectives. PEMFCs play a central role in clean energy systems because of their high efficiency, zero emission, and their use in transportation, portable power, and stationary energy solutions. Nevertheless, they have nonlinear electrochemical dynamics and are sensitive to operating conditions, which are major challenges in parameter identification and performance prediction. Current metaheuristic algorithms are usually plagued by premature convergence, inefficient computation and instability when solving such complex, multi-variable systems. The new HGOA overcomes these drawbacks by combining elite retention, opposition-based learning, feasibility repair, and local search with the standard Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm (GOA). These modifications make convergence faster, more diverse in solutions and more robust in parameter tuning. Validation was performed on seven PEMFC test cases (FC1-FC7) with various operating conditions. The findings indicate that HGOA has better accuracy with the lowest Absolute Error (AE = 0.0026), Relative Error Percentage (RE% = 0.0613%) and almost zero Mean Bias Error (MBE) recorded in all cases. Moreover, HGOA is computationally more efficient, stable and predictively reliable than nine state-of-the-art metaheuristic algorithms, such as GOA, ECO, RIME, EO, and PO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.