ArticleScientific reports2025
Quantitative analysis of ferrohydrodynamics of blood containing magnetic nanocarriers for advanced drug delivery design via hybrid machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Xue model exploration for oxytactic microbes in radiative MHD hybrid nanoliquid using machine learning technique.Discover nano · 2026Article
- Solubility of Glibenclamide in supercritical solvent versus pressure and temperature via development of machine learning and rain optimization algorithm.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Computational fluid dynamics modeling and simulation of nanoparticle-tumor interaction: Systematic literature review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ferrohydrodynamics of blood containing magnetic nanocarriers was carried out in this study to evaluate the influence of magnetic field on the nanocarrier drug delivery formulation, with the goal of improving spatial control and efficiency in advanced targeted drug delivery systems. The model of magnetic field was carried out by Maxwell' model, while the blood velocity through the vessel was modeled using Navier-Stokes equations. Then the results of computations were used as input data for development of machine learning (ML) models. Indeed, a comprehensive study on the prediction of velocity (U) based on input variables (x, y) using three different ML models: K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Decision Tree (DT), and Gradient Boosting (GB) was studied. To achieve this, a systematic approach is followed, including pre-processing tasks such as normalization, outlier detection, and data splitting into training and testing sets. Hyper-parameter optimization is performed using the Rain Optimization Algorithm (ROA) to fine-tune the models and improve their predictive capabilities. The final findings show the robustness of the DT, KNN, and GB models in predicting velocity. The DT model achieved an R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.