Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41087429›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Multi-omics tests identify novel shared genetic mechanisms of primary biliary cholestasis and sarcopenia.

Zhonghai Wang, Meiling Yu, Han Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhonghai WangDepartment of Cardiology, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, No.82 Qinglong St, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Meiling YuNorth Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
Han WangDepartment of Cardiology, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, No.82 Qinglong St, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. wanghan9727@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-8842-6248

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) may affect skeletal muscles through the muscle-liver axis, subsequently leading to sarcopenia. Our study aims to explore the unclear genetic relationships between PBC and sarcopenia. We investigated the shared genetic architecture of PBC and sarcopenia using advanced statistical genetics methods and genome-wide association summary data. We employed global and local genetic correlation to gain potential shared biological mechanisms. We identified risk single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and functionally annotated genomic multi-markers by conducting the unified test for molecular signatures. Finally, we prioritized fine-mapping analysis to emphasize the significant causal genes. Our study has identified significant genomic associations, suggesting the complex genetic interactions between PBC and sarcopenia. At the genomic level, we identified 17 unique bivariate regions among 88 trait pairs. In the bivariate locus analysis, we identified a total of 136 pleiotropic loci, with ASTN1, TGFB2, and ACP1 being particularly prominent. Functional enrichment analysis highlighted putative pleiotropic genomic regions, including brain and spleen. Furthermore, the identified pleiotropic loci demonstrate strong signal transduction in the cGMP-PKG signaling pathway. Our findings highlight shared genetic links and causal relationships between PBC and sarcopenia, offering novel insights into their genetic mechanisms.

Indexed as

Liver Cirrhosis, BiliarySarcopeniaGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsHumansMultiomicsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociGenome-wide association studiesPleiotropic genesPrimary biliary cholangitisSarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID41087429
PMCPMC12521401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.