ArticleScientific reports2025
Empirical study on the effect of single insect sounds on human perception based on pressure and engagement indicators.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of forest park's biological sounds on the positive responses of stressed university student.iScience · 2026Article
- Electrophysiological evidence for the emotional benefits of auditory nature therapy among psychiatric healthcare workers.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The chirping of insects is an important component of the soundscape in forest parks and has significant physiological effects on human perception. In this study, utilized electroencephalography (EEG) to analyze the responses of 30 university students to the sounds of six types of insects in a northeastern forest park. The results indicated that the physical parameters of the sounds of a single insect, such as the frequency (T6. α2: p = 0.046) and amplitude (T5. α2: p = 0.041), can reduce perceived stress and promote relaxation. However, regression statistical data showed that as the frequency and amplitude of insect chirps increased, people's engagement in work decreased (T4.β2/(α1 + θ): p = 0.049, T4.β2/(α2 + θ): p = 0.016), and their attention to work was distracted (T4.β1/α2: p = 0.004, p = 0.003). Additionally, demographic characteristics such as sex, educational level, and living environment also impacted the perception of sounds. Males, undergraduates, and rural residents were more sensitive to these auditory stimuli than females, postgraduates, and urban residents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.