ArticleScientific reports2025
Integrating traditional Chinese pulse diagnosis with machine learning: novel approaches for pregnancy and coronary heart disease identification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond transparency: why Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) need explainable artificial intelligence (XAI).Chinese medicine · 2026Review
- A Hybrid Network Integrating 1DCNN, GRU, and ISENet for Pulse Signal Pattern Analysis.Journal of pregnancy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study integrated ancient Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) pulse diagnosis techniques with modern machine learning to advance contemporary medical diagnostics. A portable intelligent TCM pulse diagnostic device was developed using MEMS and CMOS technologies to collect detailed pulse waveform data from three groups: healthy females, females with coronary heart disease (CHD), and pregnant females in the first trimester. Three feature selection methods-Random Forest, Recursive Feature Elimination, and correlation analysis were adopted to identify key pulse features. Thirteen classification algorithms using various combinations of feature selection and machine learning approaches were evaluated. This study achieved a maximum classification accuracy of 80% using solely pulse data. Incorporating clinical parameters such as temperature and age significantly increased classification accuracy to 91%. The Gradient Boosting Decision Tree model with correlation analysis-based feature selection and Random Forest-based dimensionality reduction demonstrated the highest accuracy. Key pulse features identified included those related to the Liver Meridian, Pericardium Meridian, and Heart Meridian, which are crucial for differentiating the three groups. This study validated the clinical utility of pulse diagnostic devices when combined with machine learning algorithms. This study demonstrates concrete clinical utility for the pulse diagnostic device, while empirically validating foundational TCM concepts. It establishes a rigorous framework to advance evidence-driven modernization of pulse diagnosis protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.