ArticleNature communications2025
A comprehensive benchmark of single-cell Hi-C embedding tools.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hi-Cformer enables multiscale chromatin contact map modeling for single-cell Hi-C data analysis.Science advances · 2026Article
- Integrative Epigenomics: Bioinformatics Strategies for Multi-Omics Data Analysis in Health and Disease.Epigenomes · 2026Review
- SCUDDO: an unsupervised clustering algorithm for single-cell Hi-C maps using diagonal diffusion operators.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Single-Cell and Spatial Omics: Methods and Applications.MedComm · 2026Review
- A comprehensive benchmark of single-cell Hi-C embedding tools.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Embedding is the key step in single-cell Hi-C (scHi-C) analysis which relies on capturing biological meaningful heterogeneity at various levels of genome architecture. To understand the strength and limitations of existing tools in various applications, here we use ten scHi-C datasets to benchmark thirteen embedding tools including Va3DE, a new convolutional neural network model that can accommodate large cell numbers. We built a software framework to decouple the preprocessing options of existing tools and found that no single tool works best across all datasets under default settings. The difficulty levels and preferred resolutions are different between benchmark datasets, and the choice of data representation and preprocessing strongly impact the embedding performance. Embedding cells from early embryonic stages relies on long-range compartment-scale contacts, but resolving cell cycle phases and complex tissue requires short-range loop-scale contacts. Both random-walk and inverse document frequency (IDF) transformation prefers long-range "compartment-scale" over short-range "loop-scale" embedding, while deep-learning methods better overcome sparsity at both scales and are more versatile with different resolutions. Finally, "diagonal integration" with independent data modal is a promising approach to distinguish similar cell subpopulations. Our findings underscore the significance of appropriate priors for scHi-C embedding and also offer insights into genome architecture heterogeneity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.