Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41087396›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Impact of social rewarding in dynamic shop floor environments.

Unais Sait, Marco Frego, Antonella De Angeli, Angelika Peer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Unais SaitFaculty of Engineering, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.
Marco FregoFaculty of Engineering, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.
Antonella De AngeliFaculty of Engineering, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.
Angelika PeerFaculty of Engineering, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy. angelika.peer@unibz.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cooperation is crucial in collaborative work environments such as manufacturing shop floors. This study investigates the application of indirect reciprocity-where individuals cooperate to build a positive reputation-in improving shop floor efficiency using a cost-benefit mechanism. The research explores a dynamic scenario where workers, possessing varied skill levels, engage in cooperative behaviours when encountering social dilemmas. Using real shop floor data as input to a simulation model, the study analyses how different cooperation strategies can affect key performance metrics, including worker skill scarcity duration, machine delay time, and benefit-cost ratio. Results indicate that full cooperation significantly enhances task allocation efficiency, reduces machine delays, and optimises resource utilisation, outperforming other strategies such as partial cooperation and defection, and full defection. The study provides evidence that cooperative strategies based on social incentives not only improve immediate task execution but also reveal the importance of a culture of accountability and mutual support among workers. These findings suggest the potential of integrating social cooperation principles into shop floor management systems to address skill demand challenges, to minimise operational delays, and to promote overall productivity.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorRewardCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansWorkplaceCooperation strategiesIndirect reciprocitySmart manufacturingSocial rewardsTask allocation

Identifiers

PMID41087396
PMCPMC12521501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.