ArticleScientific reports2025
Serological surveillance of orally acquired acute Chagas disease in the Brazilian Amazon using conventional and in house assays.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Overview of Chagas disease in Amazonas: an integrated approach.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2026Review
- Establishing tropical medicine as a recognized medical specialty or strengthening its training within infectious diseases residency programs in Colombia: an urgent need.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the Brazilian Amazon, cases of acute Chagas disease (ACD) are mostly associated with the consumption of açaí juice contaminated with Trypanosoma cruzi have become frequent. A large proportion of diagnosed patients and exposed individuals after outbreaks are not followed-up clinically since they reside in the remote interior of the state of Amazonas with limited access to healthcare services. This study aims to conduct serological surveillance of populations exposed to T. cruzi in orally transmitted ACD. We evaluated 66 individuals with a history of diagnosis and treatment (G1), and 49 individuals without proven infection after exposure to outbreaks (G2). Serological surveillance was performed using 3 commercially available tests and 2 genotype-specific tests using antigens from T. cruzi strains TcI and TcIV. Among the G1, 34.8% presented serological cure whereas 6.1% in G2 presented seroconversion for IgG anti-T. cruzi while 22.5% (G2) had indeterminate results due to discordance between IIF and ELISA tests, which use different principles. Genotype-specific ELISA (TcI-TcIV) tests showed detection rates between 30.3 and 31.8% in G1, and 14.3-22.4% in G2. These results highlight the importance of follow-up serological surveillance among Amazonian populations exposed to ACD outbreaks. It also underscores the need for more sensitive serological tests with greater agreement for to ensure accurate diagnosis and monitoring of populations with a history of exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.