Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41087384›Full record

ArticleNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2025

Developing an interprofessional collaboration for COPD patients in primary care: a participatory action research approach.

F L de Zwart, L van den Bemt, B van den Borst, M de Man, M M van den Heuvel, M A Spruit, Ewma Bischoff, A J van 't Hul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

F L de ZwartDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. lieven.dezwart@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8929-162X
L van den BemtDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboudumc Research Institute for Medical Innovation, P.O. Box 9101, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3771-8273
B van den BorstDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4597-2722
M de ManDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, Bernhoven, Uden, The Netherlands.
M M van den HeuvelDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6372-2153
M A SpruitNUTRIM Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3822-7430
Ewma BischoffDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3323-8475
A J van 't HulDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5514-2327

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a respiratory disease which may significantly impact health status. To reduce symptoms and improve quality of life, pharmacological treatment should be complemented by addressing extrapulmonary traits and lifestyle- and psychosocial factors, such as physical deconditioning, decrease in muscle mass, smoking or depression. Treatment of these non-pharmacological traits is commonly conducted in a primary care setting and often requires multiple healthcare providers (HCPs). To provide complementary care, high quality interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is required. Therefore, our aim was to develop an IPC model for COPD patients treated in primary care. To achieve our aims, we used co-creation sessions (CCS), a recognised method within the participatory action research (PAR) approach. Co-creation, characterised by collaboration and a bottom-up strategy, has repeatedly shown to be suitable for developing care improvements. We recruited two independent groups of stakeholders to participate in six CCS in parallel. They were purposefully sampled and included patients and HCPs from both primary and secondary/tertiary care. Given the considerable overlap in results between the two independent teams, we developed a joint model which is ready to be pilot tested. Our model is based on current and local work methods and can be implemented in existing local contexts and structures. We noted some differences between the teams: the choice of the routing and timing of IPC commencement, and the choice for the communication platform. Using the PAR approach and co-creation, we developed an actionable IPC model in primary care for COPD patients.

Indexed as

Interprofessional RelationsPatient Care TeamPrimary Health CarePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAgedCooperative BehaviorFemaleHealth Services ResearchHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID41087384
PMCPMC12521667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.