Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41087345›Full record

ArticleSignal transduction and targeted therapy2025

In vivo self-assembled nano-PROTAC for the dual degradation of AR and HSP90 to overcome castration-resistant prostate cancer resistance.

Fei-Ya Yang, Ni-Yuan Zhang, Yang Yang, Dong Chen, Li-Yuan Wu, Wen-Kuan Wang, Hao-Xi Wang, Zhuan Wen, Ming-Ze Cai, Hao-Ze Li and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Signal transduction and targeted therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Supramolecular Degraders: An Emerging Paradigm in Targeted Protein Degradation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Fei-Ya Yang *Department of Urology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Ni-Yuan Zhang *CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology (NCNST), Zhongguancun, Beijing, China.
Yang Yang *CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology (NCNST), Zhongguancun, Beijing, China.
Dong ChenDepartment of Urology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Li-Yuan WuDepartments of Pathology, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Wen-Kuan WangDepartment of Urology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Hao-Xi WangDepartment of Urology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Zhuan WenCAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology (NCNST), Zhongguancun, Beijing, China.
Ming-Ze CaiCAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology (NCNST), Zhongguancun, Beijing, China.
Hao-Ze LiCAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology (NCNST), Zhongguancun, Beijing, China.
Haojie HuangDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Institute of Urologic Science and Technology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Hong-Wei AnCAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology (NCNST), Zhongguancun, Beijing, China. anhw@nanoctr.cn.
Hao WangCAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology (NCNST), Zhongguancun, Beijing, China. wanghao@nanoctr.cn.
Nian-Zeng XingDepartment of Urology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. xingnianzeng@126.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 52273126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Castration-resistant prostate cancer demonstrates intrinsic or acquired resistance to second-generation androgen-targeted therapies, posing a challenge in clinical treatment. In this study, on the basis of in vivo self-assembly nanotechnology, we designed a PSMA-targeted nano-PROTAC with a proximity degradation effect. Nano-PROTAC not only precisely degrades the AR receptor but also cleverly degrades the HSP90 that is closely bound to the AR receptor, utilizing the spatial distance self-adaptive characteristics of its nanostructure. In the 22Rv1 cell model, Nano-PROTAC degraded 80% of the AR protein and 65% of the HSP90 protein. More importantly, nano-PROTAC could degrade 74% of the AR splice variant AR-V7 protein, showing the potential ability to overcome drug resistance. We further constructed an enzalutamide-resistant xenograft tumor mouse model to evaluate the therapeutic effect of the Nano-PROTAC. Compared with the combination treatment group of AR and HSP90 inhibitors (enzalutamide and pimitespib), the nano-PROTAC treatment group presented a high tumor growth inhibition value of up to 78% and a median survival extension of 15 days. Nano-PROTACs that simultaneously degrade AR and HSP90 can overcome the resistance of prostate cancer to PSMA- and AR-positive castration-resistant prostate cancer, except for neuroendocrine prostate cancer, which provides a new therapeutic strategy for the treatment of prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantReceptors, AndrogenAnimalsBenzamidesCell Line, TumorHumansMaleMiceNitrilesPhenylthiohydantoinProteolysisXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAR protein, humanBenzamidesenzalutamideHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsNitrilesPhenylthiohydantoinReceptors, Androgen

Identifiers

PMID41087345
PMCPMC12521527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.