ArticleAcademic radiology2026
Evaluating Stack-of-Stars and FLORET 3D Ultrashort Echo Time MRI to Assess Structural Pathology in Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease.
Article in Academic radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Ultrashort Echo Time (UTE) MRI Low Signal Volume Analysis in Stable Pediatric Cystic Fibrosis and After Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor Therapy.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Comparison of Signal- and Volume-Based Ventilation-Weighted Assessment Using 3D FLORET UTE MRI in Patients With Various Pulmonary Disease.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
RATIONALE AND
objectivesFree-breathing structural lung MRI using 3D Ultrashort Echo Time (UTE) techniques has advanced substantially; however, image quality and diagnostic performance can vary depending on the acquisition strategy. Stack-of-Stars (SoS) is a commonly available UTE method, whereas FLORET (Fermat Looped, Orthogonally Encoded Trajectories) enables more efficient and isotropic k-space sampling. Thus, the purpose of this study was to compare the image quality and diagnostic performance of SoS and FLORET 3D UTE MRI in detecting structural lung abnormalities in individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF). MATERIALS AND
methodsSix individuals with CF (24.6 ± 7.3 years) underwent free-breathing lung MRI using multi-echo SoS for bronchiectasis T
resultsFLORET demonstrated significantly higher Sr (216 ± 60 vs 153 ± 76) and Cr (15.1 ± 5.2 vs 6.8 ± 9.6) than SoS (P < .001). Qualitative image scores were superior for FLORET across all domains. FLORET Brody scores correlated strongly with CT (R² = 0.95, κ = 0.94), while SoS showed weaker agreement (R² = 0.40, κ = 0.44). Inter-reader agreement was also higher with FLORET (R² = 0.70, κ = 0.82).
conclusionFLORET 3D UTE MRI provides superior image quality, improved diagnostic agreement, and stronger correlation with CT compared to SoS, supporting its use as a radiation-free alternative for structural assessment in CF lung disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.