ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2025
What is the relationship between population health and voting patterns: an ecological study in England.
Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealth is a fundamental issue in politics and an area where governments hold significant levers of influence. Countries in Europe have seen increased support for populist political parties, with some evidence linking support for these parties to health metrics. We aimed to establish if there is an association between health metrics and patterns of voting in England, particularly in relation to a recently established political party, Reform UK, in the 2024 general election.
methodsWe conducted a cross sectional ecological study with data from all constituencies in England (n=543). We conducted Pearson correlations and linear regression between the proportion of eligible votes for Reform UK and estimated prevalence of 20 common non-communicable diseases, including obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, type 2 diabetes and depression.
resultsConstituencies electing Reform members of parliament (MPs) (n=5/543) had the highest average prevalence of asthma (7.44%) and COPD (2.85%). Across the country, adjusting for age, sex and deprivation, a 10% increase in the party's vote share was associated with a +0.261% (95% CI 0.213% to 0.309%) prevalence of COPD, a +0.113% (95% CI 0.026% to 0.201%) prevalence of asthma and a +1.479% (95% CI 1.239% to 1.720%) increase in obesity prevalence.
conclusionsAt a constituency level, poor health, in particular conditions associated with breathlessness, was associated with a greater proportion of votes for Reform UK.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.