Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41087167›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025

Selective Attention Shapes Neural Representations of Complex Auditory Scenes: The Roles of Object Identity and Scene Composition.

Patrik Wikman, Ilkka Muukkonen, Jaakko Kauramäki, Ville Laaksonen, Onnipekka Varis, Christopher Petkov, Josef Rauschecker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Patrik WikmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland patrik.wikman@helsinki.fi.
Ilkka MuukkonenDepartment of Psychology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland.
Jaakko KauramäkiDepartment of Psychology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland.
Ville LaaksonenBetter Taste Music, Helsinki 00510, Finland.
Onnipekka VarisDepartment of Psychology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland.
Christopher PetkovDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242.
Josef RauscheckerDepartment of Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057.ORCID 0000-0003-4353-9084

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Everyday auditory scenes contain overlapping sound objects, requiring attention to isolate relevant objects from irrelevant background objects. This study examined how selective attention shapes neural representations of complex sound scenes in the auditory cortex (AC). Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we recorded brain activity from participants (12 males, 8 females) as they attended to a designated object in scenes comprising three overlapping sounds. Scenes were constructed in two manners: one where each object belonged to a different category (speech, animal, instrument) and another where all objects were from the same category. Attending to speech enhanced activations in lateral AC subfields, while attention to animal and instrument sounds preferentially modulated medial AC subfields, supporting models where attention modulates feature-selective neural gain in AC. Remarkably, however, spatial pattern analysis revealed that the attended object dominated the AC activation patterns of the entire scene in a manner depending on both object type and scene composition: When scene objects belonged to different categories, attention effects were dominated by category-level processing. In contrast, when all scene objects shared the same category, dominance shifted to exemplar-level processing in fields processing acoustic features. Thus, attention seems to dynamically prioritize the features offering maximal contrast within a given context, emphasizing object-specific patterns in feature-similar scenes and category-level patterns in feature-diverse scenes. Our results support models where top-down signals not only modulate gain but also affect scene decomposition and analysis-influencing stream segregation and gating of higher-level processing in a contextual manner, adapting to specific auditory environments.

Indexed as

AttentionAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung Adultauditory objectsauditory scene analysisfunctional magnetic resonance imagingmultivariate pattern analysisselective attentiontop-down modulation

Identifiers

PMID41087167
PMCPMC12660173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.