ArticleSaudi medical journal2025
An evaluation of pharmaceutical clinical trials from Saudi Arabia registered on Clinicaltrials.gov: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Saudi medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate clinical trials involving pharmaceutical agents conducted in Saudi Arabia and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Since the early 2000s, Saudi Arabia has expanded its involvement in clinical research. Recognizing the importance of clinical trials, we aimed to analyze the clinical trial landscape in the Kingdom to identify well-covered areas and potential gaps.
methodsIn this descriptive cross-sectional study, ClinicalTrials.gov was used as the primary source to collect data regarding pharmacological and biological interventions conducted in Saudi Arabia between 2002 and June 2025.
resultsA total of 474 pharmaceutical studies were included. Of these, 52.95% were completed, indicating moderate research activity but suggesting room for growth compared to global benchmarks. Among completed trials, 38.64% had their results published on ClinicalTrials.gov. Overall, 223 sponsors were identified: 23.32% were international pharmaceutical companies and 24.22% were Saudi sponsors, of which 77.78% were governmental and 22.22% private. Additionally, 239 studies were funded by international companies. Oncology (23.21%) was the most represented medical field, followed by infectious diseases (12.87%).
conclusionSaudi Arabia witnessed an increase in registered clinical trials between 2002 and June 2025, with strong contributions from both international and Saudi sponsors, particularly the governmental sector. However, only one-fifth of completed trials had results published on ClinicalTrials.gov, highlighting the need for greater transparency and dissemination of findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.