SynthesisAmerican journal of infection control2026
Infection prevention and control knowledge, attitudes, and practices among patients and informal caregivers in home-based care: A systematic review.
Synthesis in American journal of infection control, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- When informal caregivers become double victims: Development of a multilevel conceptual framework for safer home care.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Review
- Infection prevention and control knowledge, attitudes, and practices among home health care patients and their family caregivers: Findings from a multisite survey.American journal of infection control · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInfection prevention and control (IPC) remains a challenge in home-based care, a rapidly expanding care sector worldwide. Despite the central role of patients and informal caregivers, little is known about their knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP).
methodsWe conducted a systematic review, following PRISMA guidelines, to synthesize evidence on IPC-related KAP among adult patients and informal caregivers in home-based care. PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase were searched for peer-reviewed studies from 1990 to 2025. Eligible studies focused on IPC-related KAP in home health care or home-based care. Study quality was assessed using the 2018 Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.
resultsThirty-four studies met inclusion criteria. Knowledge gaps were common in condition- and device-specific areas such as nebulizer hygiene, catheter care, and wound management. Attitudes were influenced by perceived infection risk, stigma, and social responsibility. While hand hygiene was frequently practiced, adherence to more complex IPC behaviors, such as equipment disinfection and quarantine, was limited. Informal caregivers often assumed IPC responsibilities without adequate training or support.
conclusionsIPC-related KAP remains inconsistent among patients and informal caregivers in home-based care, especially in complex or resource-limited settings. Targeted education, caregiver support, and validated KAP assessment tools are needed to improve IPC in this growing sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.