ArticleTransplantation and cellular therapy2026
Peripheral Blood or Bone Marrow Grafts for Mismatched Unrelated Donors with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide-Based Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis.
Article in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts generally are considered a risk factor for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) compared to bone marrow (BM) in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). High-dose post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), originally introduced for T cell-replete haploidentical transplantation, has become more widely used in matched unrelated donor (MUD) and mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) HCT with PBSCs and has been shown to reduce the difference between MUDs and MMUDs. Despite this progress, the comparative impact of PBSC grafts versus BM grafts in this specific setting remains unclear. Using data collected by the Cetner for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, we aimed to compare outcomes between PBSCs and BM as graft sources in patients undergoing HCT with an HLA 7/8 MMUD receiving PTCy-based prophylaxis. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and systemic immunosuppressive therapy-requiring chronic GVHD (IST-R cGVHD). With a median follow-up of 36 months, 709 patients received PBSC grafts and 171 received BM grafts from an MMUD. The 2 groups were closely comparable. In univariable analyses, 3-year OS was similar in the PBSC group (57%; 95% CI [confidence interval], 53% to 61%) and the BM group (58%; 95% CI, 51% to 66%) (P = 0.63), as was the rate of IST-R cGVHD (30% [95% CI, 26% to 33%] versus 25% [95% CI, 19% to 32%]; P = .25). Other secondary outcomes showed no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups. In multivariable analyses, the use of PBSC grafts was not associated with different OS (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.25; P = .78) or IST-R cGVHD (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.98; P = .054). However, all grades of cGVHD were significantly higher with PBSC grafts (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.06 to 2.00; P = .019). Other outcomes did not differ statistically in the multivariable analysis. Our results indicate no significant difference in the primary outcomes between bone marrow and peripheral blood in HLA 7/8 MMUD transplants with PT-Cy-based GVHD prophylaxis. This challenges the historical belief that BM transplantation leads to better outcomes in unrelated donor settings compared with PBSC transplantation. Until randomized studies indicate otherwise, choosing graft sources can reasonably focus on donor convenience and logistic feasibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.