Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41086859›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2025

How many characters are needed to reconstruct a phylogeny?

Alessio Capobianco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alessio CapobiancoGeoBio-Center LMU, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich 80333, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6096-3875

Funding

European Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite increased recent attention towards Bayesian phylogenetics and its applications in understanding macroevolutionary processes, it remains unclear how many discrete characters are needed to accurately estimate tree topologies in a Bayesian framework. This could be particularly relevant for morphological datasets used in phylogenetics, as they usually consist of few dozens to few hundreds of characters-orders of magnitude smaller than most molecular datasets. I designed a simulation study in the software RevBayes to explore how the number of sampled discrete characters affects accuracy and precision of Bayesian phylogenetic estimates, under various set-ups differing in number of taxa, average number of state changes per character (i.e. tree length) and number of states per character. Results indicate that between 100 and 500 variable characters are necessary to reach sufficient accuracy and precision of phylogenetic estimates for as low as 20 tips. All other parameters being equal, multistate characters produce slightly more accurate estimates than binary characters and more labile characters produce more accurate estimates for trees above 50 tips. The results of this study highlight the continuous need for global research efforts geared towards the characterization and digitization of interspecific morphological diversity in both extant and extinct taxa.

Indexed as

ClassificationPhylogenyBayes TheoremBiological EvolutionComputer SimulationSoftwareBayesian phylogeneticscharacter matrixdataset sizeMkvmolecular charactersmorphological charactersRevBayessimulationsystematics

Identifiers

PMID41086859
PMCPMC12520789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.