ArticleCognition2026
Semantic memory network resilience in aging: The role of abstract and semantically diverse words.
Article in Cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development, Normative Data, and Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Semantic Association Test (SEMAT) for Middle-Aged and Older Adults.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Preserved topography, lateralization, selectivity, and functional connectivity of the language network in older brains.Nature communications · 2026Article
- The properties of personal semantics.Memory & cognition · 2026Article
- Semantic diversity in Chinese words: Exploring its role in word recognition, lexical ambiguity, character complexity, and semantic alignment.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Reduced age differences in semantic memory networks: Evidence from semantically diverse free associations.Neuropsychologia · 2026Article
- Lexical retrieval in fluent and nonfluent aphasia: a network analysis of verbal fluency data.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Individuals continuously acquire new words and concepts throughout their lifespan. Previous research on semantic memory networks found that with increased age, semantic memory becomes less efficient, less organized, and more sparsely connected. Most of this work focused on concrete concepts, though abstract concepts comprise a significant portion of our knowledge and may fundamentally differ in their organization and lexical properties. The current study examined age-related differences in semantic networks of 47 younger adults (20-35 years) and 49 older adults (60-78 years) based on semantic relatedness judgments of words that varied in concreteness and semantic diversity. Adding abstract words to semantic memory estimations significantly altered the network structures and, in some cases, minimized age differences. Networks that included abstract words were more interconnected (higher clustering coefficients and lower modularity) and more efficient (shorter path lengths), and abstract words remained connected in the networks longer under simulated 'attacks' compared to concrete word networks. Independent effects of semantic diversity and concreteness suggest that words that are more semantically diverse or abstract are more connected in the networks. Finally, age-related differences were minimal when considering individual-based semantic memory networks that included both abstract and concrete words, while group-based network analyses suggested more prominent age differences consistent with previous observations (e.g., less efficiency, interconnectedness, and more segregation). Overall, this study advances our understanding of age-related differences in semantic memory highlighting the important influence that abstract words and semantic diversity have on the mental lexicon, and the importance of analyzing semantic networks with multiple approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.