Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41086436›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2025

Parental Use of Social Media and the Internet in the Context of Their Child's Genetic Neurodevelopmental Disorder: Mixed Methods Study Nested in the GenROC Cohort Study.

Karen Jaqueline Low, Georgia Treneman-Evans, Sarah L Wynn, Jenny Ingram, John Powell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karen Jaqueline LowCentre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 3JZ, United Kingdom, 44 1173420000.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4975-9363
Georgia Treneman-EvansCentre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 3JZ, United Kingdom, 44 1173420000.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0707-6078
Sarah L WynnUnique, Oxted, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6531-8181
Jenny IngramCentre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 3JZ, United Kingdom, 44 1173420000.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2366-008X
John PowellNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1456-4857

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Social media groups (SMGs) enable individuals with rare diseases to connect with one another and access instant support and advice. Accelerated diagnoses of genetic neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) over the last decade have driven rapid expansion of gene-specific SMG membership. Limited literature regarding parental use of SMGs in the context of managing their child's NDD exists. Objective: The objective of our study was to determine and describe how parents use social media and the internet in the context of their child's NDD. Methods: We undertook a mixed methods study of 477 parents within a cohort of children with NDDs (Genetic Rare Disease: Observational Cohort Study; GenROC). A total of 359 parents provided quantifiable survey responses regarding their use of social media. We also interviewed 17 parents to understand how they use SMGs and their views on the data held within these groups. Results: Our survey found 359/475 (75.7%) of parents use SMGs related to their child's genetic disorder, and of these, 98.5% (354/359) are on Facebook. Most SMGs are closed, international, have more than 200 members, are specific to the NDD, and are associated with a corresponding charity or foundation. In total, 191/312 (61.2%) parents could not recall what they had consented to when joining the group with respect to the use of their posted data. Most parents trust the data (Likert scale 1-10; mean 7.03, SD 1.98) that are shared but acknowledged the anecdotal nature of them. Parents found the most valuable element of the SMG to be shared lived experience with other families. Interview data from 17 parents were coded and analyzed thematically. A total of 4 main themes were identified: (1) SMGs for support and shared lived experience; (2) possible harms from participation in SMGs; (3) SMG composition, demographics, and dynamics; and (4) usefulness and use of data shared within the groups. Conclusions: This mixed methods study shows the evolving landscape of SMG use in neurodevelopmental disorders, highlights its benefits and downsides, and is widely applicable to all parent SMGs for specific niche medical conditions. Using the strength of these groups in a more collaborative approach in the future could prove useful to clinicians, families, and researchers alike.

Indexed as

genetic neurodevelopmental disordersgeneticsmixed methods researchonline health communitiesparental supportrare diseasesocial media

Identifiers

PMID41086436
PMCPMC12520642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.