ArticleJMIR aging2025
The Use of Technology to Deliver In-Home Aged Care Services: Mixed Methods Study of Australian Staff Perspectives.
Article in JMIR aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of Guidelines for Implementing Digital Technology Into In-Home Aged Care: Mixed Methods Approach.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With a global aging population, technology has been proposed as a solution to address the growing demand for services in the in-home aged care sector. Despite the potential of technology, there are difficulties when implementing technology into routine care delivery. There is a lack of evidence regarding the specific factors affecting technology use in the in-home aged care setting from the perspective of the direct care workforce. Objective: This study aimed to understand in-home aged care staff members' views of (1) the digital enablement potential of direct in-home care tasks, (2) benefits and drawbacks of technology use, and (3) enablers and barriers for technology use in Australian in-home aged care. Methods: An explanatory sequential mixed methods research design was used, with a cross-sectional survey and semistructured staff interviews. Participants were recruited from in-home aged care staff members working at a national Australian in-home health and aged care organization. Results: In total, 226 participants completed the survey, and 18 participants completed the interviews. Overall, participants felt that many care tasks within in-home aged care could be digitally enabled, with more than half (56%) of the common direct care tasks identified as being likely to be digitally enabled. Participants also discussed a range of quality of care-, staff-, and organization-related benefits and drawbacks in the use of technology. Finally, participants agreed that most of the researcher-proposed enablers and barriers were important, while suggesting additional enablers and barriers such as client preferences regarding technology use and poor data connectivity. Conclusions: This study provides insight into staff members' views regarding the use of technology to deliver in-home aged care services. The results could help inform technology developers and in-home aged care providers, providing key information to guide technology implementation into care delivery. Further research is required to ensure that appropriate strategies are available to ensure successful implementation of technology into in-home aged care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.