ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2025
Automatically Calculated Context-Sensitive Features of Connected Speech Improve Prediction of Impairment in Alzheimer's Disease.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Surprisal from Large Language Models as an individual difference: Capturing the individual regardless of the text answer.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeEarly detection is critical for effective management of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other dementias. One promising approach for predicting AD status is to automatically calculate linguistic features from open-ended connected speech. Past work has focused on individual word-level features such as part of speech counts, total word production, and lexical richness, with less emphasis on measuring the relationship between words and the context in which they are produced. Here, we assessed whether linguistic features that take into account where a word was produced in the discourse context improved the ability to predict AD patients' Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores and classify AD patients from healthy control participants.
methodSeventeen linguistic features were automatically computed from transcriptions of spoken picture descriptions from individuals with probable or possible AD (
resultsLinguistic features accurately predicted MMSE scores in individuals with probable or possible AD and successfully identified up to 87% of AD participants versus healthy controls. Statistical models that contained linguistic surprisal (a contextual feature) performed better than those that included only word-level and demographic features. Overall, AD patients with lower MMSE scores produced more empty words, fewer nouns and definite articles, and words that were higher frequency yet more surprising given the previous context.
conclusionThese results provide novel evidence that metrics related to contextualized word choices, particularly the surprisal of an individual's words, capture variance in degree of cognitive decline in AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.