Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41086291›Full record

ArticleHolistic nursing practice

Ethical Challenges and Stress for Health Care Professionals in Life Support Withdrawal.

Ching-Mei Chang, Hsien-Feng Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Holistic nursing practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ching-Mei ChangAuthor Affiliations: College of Nursing, Hungkuang University, Taichung, Taiwan (R.O.C.) (Dr Chang), and Department of Family Medicine, Heanclinic, Taichung, Taiwan (R.O.C.) (Dr Lin).
Hsien-Feng Lin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Withdrawing life-sustaining treatment (WLST) in terminally ill patients' presents significant ethical and emotional challenges for health care professionals. This cross-sectional study surveyed 436 health care providers at a teaching hospital in central Taiwan to explore the conflicts and stressors they face during WLST. Key ethical conflicts included unclear definitions of terminal illness, differing family attitudes, and ambiguous responsibility for extubation. Major stressors involved performing extubation, disclosing medical conditions, providing grief support, and navigating institutional procedures. Unmarried, younger, less experienced staff, particularly those without children or working in pediatric or surgical ICUs, were more susceptible to ethical stress ( P <.01). Nurses and respiratory therapists reported more conflict over extubation responsibility, while physicians struggled more with defining terminal illness ( P <.05). The findings highlight the need for clear guidelines, structured family meetings, multidisciplinary coordination, targeted education, emotional support systems, and broader public engagement with advance medical directives to reduce the ethical burden on health care professionals involved in WLST.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelStress, PsychologicalWithholding TreatmentAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesEthical DilemmasFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTaiwanethical challengehealth care professionalsstresswithdrawal of life-sustaining treatment

Identifiers

PMID41086291
PMCPMC13680772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.