Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41086244›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Exact conditions for evolutionary stability in indirect reciprocity under noise.

Nikoleta E Glynatsi, Christian Hilbe, Yohsuke Murase

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nikoleta E GlynatsiRIKEN Center for Interdisciplinary Theoretical and Mathematical Science (iTHEMS), Wako, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2943-3622
Christian HilbeInterdisciplinary Transformation University, Linz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5116-955X
Yohsuke MuraseRIKEN Center for Interdisciplinary Theoretical and Mathematical Science (iTHEMS), Wako, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5872-420X

Funding

European Research Council (ERC)Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) (JSPS KAKENH)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indirect reciprocity is a key mechanism for large-scale cooperation. This mechanism captures the insight that in part, people help others to build and maintain a good reputation. To enable such cooperation, appropriate social norms are essential. They specify how individuals should act based on each others' reputations, and how reputations are updated in response to individual actions. Although previous work has identified several norms that sustain cooperation, a complete analytical characterization of all evolutionarily stable norms remains lacking, especially when assessments or actions are noisy. In this study, we provide such a characterization for the public assessment regime. This characterization reproduces known results, such as the leading eight norms, but it extends to more general cases, allowing for various types of errors and additional actions including costly punishment. We also identify norms that impose a fixed payoff on any mutant strategy, analogous to the zero-determinant strategies in direct reciprocity. These results offer a rigorous foundation for understanding the evolution of cooperation through indirect reciprocity and the critical role of social norms.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionCooperative BehaviorComputational BiologyComputer SimulationGame TheoryHumansSocial Norms

Identifiers

PMID41086244
PMCPMC12558610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.