ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025
Unraveling the drivers of leptospirosis risk in Thailand using machine learning.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular epidemiology of pathogenic Leptospira spp. in Thailand during 2024-2025, with detection of Leptospira weilii in human clinical specimens.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Machine learning reveals temperature as a key predictor of dengue risk across Thailand's provinces: A 20-year analysis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning identifies immune-inflammatory and immunothrombotic biomarkers for myocardial injury and mortality risk stratification in severe pneumonia with diverse infectious etiologies.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Flood-associated disease outbreaks and transmission in Southeast Asia.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Leptospirosis poses a significant public health challenge in Thailand, driven by a complex mix of environmental and socioeconomic factors. This study develops an XGBoost machine learning model to predict leptospirosis outbreak risk at the provincial level in Thailand, integrating climatic, socioeconomic, and agricultural features. Using national surveillance data from 2007-2022, the model was trained to classify provinces as high or low risk based on the median incidence rate. The model's predictive performance was validated for the years 2018-2022, spanning pre-COVID-19, COVID-19, and post-COVID-19 periods. SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) analysis was employed to identify key predictive factors. The optimized XGBoost model achieved high predictive accuracy for the pre-pandemic (AUC = 0.937 with 95% CI: 0.878 - 0.976) and post-pandemic (AUC = 0.951 with 95% CI: 0.861 - 0.999) testing periods. SHAP analysis revealed rice production factors, household size, and specific climatic variables as the strongest predictors of leptospirosis risk. However, model performance declined during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021), suggesting surveillance disruption and potential underreporting. This study demonstrates the utility of machine learning for predicting leptospirosis risk in Thailand and highlights the complex interplay of environmental and socioeconomic factors in driving outbreaks. The adaptable modeling framework provides a foundation for developing early warning systems and targeted interventions to reduce the burden of this neglected tropical disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.