ArticlePLOS digital health2025
Predicting in-hospital indicators from wearable-derived signals for cardiovascular and respiratory disease monitoring: An in silico study.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular and respiratory diseases (CVRD) are the leading causes of death worldwide. The construction of health digital twins for patient monitoring is becoming a fundamental tool to reduce invasive procedures, lower healthcare costs, minimize patient hospitalization, design clinical trials and personalize therapies. The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility of machine learning-based monitoring of healthy subjects and CVRD patients in an in silico context. A population of virtual subjects, both healthy and with CVRD, was created using a comprehensive zero-dimensional global closed-loop model. In particular, the most relevant model parameters were varied within physiologically and pathologically plausible ranges, using local sensitivity analysis to guide the parameter selection. Then, we trained Gaussian process regression (GPR) models, informed by wearable-acquired data (e.g., heart rate, peripheral pressures and oxygen saturation), to predict variables normally acquired with invasive or operator-dependent methods (e.g., central venous pressure, stroke volume, cardiac output, left ventricular ejection fraction, arterial partial pressure of O2, arterial partial pressure of CO2). We also evaluated GPR models performance under simulated wearable signal acquisition errors via an error propagation analysis. Presented results demonstrate the feasibility of predicting in-hospital variables from wearable-derived indices using GPR models under the controlled conditions and assumptions of the adopted modeling approach.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.