Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41086233›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Data-driven Bayesian networks for risk scenario mapping of Falls from height accidents.

Jue Li, Tengyao Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jue LiSchool of Transportation, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha, China.
Tengyao WangSchool of Transportation, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3239-0003

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Falls from height (FFH) represent the most frequent type of accident in the building industry, leading to substantial economic losses and posing serious threats to worker safety. While risk analysis plays a vital role in accident prevention, a more comprehensive understanding of risk can significantly contribute to reducing the occurrence of accidents. To better capture the complexity and uncertainty inherent in risk factors, this study adopted the concept of risk scenarios to investigate the underlying mechanisms and driving factors associated with FFH accidents. A total of 368 FFH accident reports from 2014 to 2024 were collected, and a Bayesian network model was developed based on the validated data extracted from these reports. Through this model, various risk scenarios of FFH accidents were systematically explored. The analysis identified five core dimensions influencing the occurrence of FFH accidents, along with five high-risk variables within these dimensions. Moreover, the study examined the probabilities of FFH accidents under different risk scenarios. This scenario-based approach offers new insights into construction safety management and provides valuable implications for enhancing FFH accident prevention strategies in construction projects.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsAccidents, OccupationalBayes TheoremConstruction IndustryHumansRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID41086233
PMCPMC12520409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.